Articles

How Tokenization Changes Asset Management

Richard Skeet

July 8, 2026

"Tokenisation is emerging as one of the transformative forces in modern finance." – Nelson Chow - HKMA.

Tokenization matters when a fund share starts acting like working inventory, not a static wrapper. A money fund, Treasury sleeve, private credit instrument, or real-asset product that lives onchain can reach more investors, move across jurisdictions more cleanly, and do more inside financing and collateral workflows. Franklin Templeton’s onchain government money fund reported $843.74 million in net assets as of March 31, 2026, and the firm said assets across its Benji platform were nearing $1.5 billion in late March. That is enough to treat tokenized funds as live market structure.

Distribution is where the business model starts to change. Franklin enabled peer-to-peer transfers for eligible holders of that fund in 2024, which meant a regulated money market fund share could move directly between approved investors on public blockchain rails. That is more than just a product feature. It widens the addressable buyer base and strips friction out of how capital reaches the product. BlackRock's 2026 product outlook points the same way, describing tokenization as part of a wider expansion of the investible universe and a bridge between traditional and digital markets.

Distribution may prove to be the real fault line. The gaming industry offers a useful analogy: many of the largest pools of value did not come from better content alone, but from better routes to the user. Steam changed PC game discovery and monetization. Mobile app stores turned casual access into the largest gaming segment, with Newzoo estimating mobile gaming at $92.6 billion, or 49% of global games revenue, in 2024. More recently, Bain noted that top-grossing mobile games have increasingly built their own direct stores, with the share rising from 12% to 44% over five years as publishers try to own more of the customer relationship and avoid platform leakage. The lesson for asset management is not that funds become games. It is that distribution architecture compounds. Managers that control more of issuance, access, transferability, collateral use, and lifecycle management should capture more of the economics than managers who only manufacture the product.

Collateral is where the commercial payoff gets harder to ignore. DTCC's current work is aimed at a simple problem: too much inventory is still slow to move, hard to finance, and trapped inside fragmented systems. Its Collateral AppChain is built to let institutions tokenize assets using any tokenization capability and use assets issued on public or private networks while staying connected to traditional market infrastructure. DTCC's launch language goes further, tying the platform to greater collateral mobility and velocity, better capital efficiency and liquidity, and a broader digital liquidity pool. That is where tokenized fund shares stop being a distribution story and start becoming better treasury assets, better funding assets, and more useful portfolio tools. The same logic extends into private credit, where a cleaner transfer stack and better collateral utility can widen access while making the asset itself easier to finance and monitor after issuance.

Th  elegal claim still has to travel with the token. The SEC’s January statement matters because it draws a line between issuer-sponsored tokenized securities and third-party structures, including custodial and synthetic forms. Those categories do not all give investors the same rights, and some leave the holder exposed to an intermediary rather than the underlying asset itself. Asset managers can work with new rails. They still need clean ownership and clean entitlements.

Asia is where this starts to look like an operating model rather than an idea. Hong Kong’s Project Ensemble moved into pilot phase in November 2025 with an initial focus on tokenized money market fund transactions and real-time liquidity and treasury management. In March, the HKMA said EnsembleTX had already entered real-value transactions involving tokenized deposits and digital assets, with more banks and more use cases to follow in 2026. That is one reason our January partnership with CPIC IMHK matters. The strategy, with an initial target capacity of up to $500 million, pairs our digital-asset market structure and operations experience with CPIC IMHK's regulated distribution and institutional network in Hong Kong.

The post-trade stack is starting to meet the product. DTCC said in December that DTC had received SEC no-action relief to offer a controlled-production tokenization service for select DTC-custodied assets, with rollout anticipated in the second half of 2026. DTCC says the digital form is intended to carry the same ownership rights, investor protections, and economic entitlements as the traditional asset, and the initial set includes highly liquid equities, ETFs, and U.S. Treasuries. That is how tokenization moves out of sidecars and into the market's core machinery.

Tokenization broadens the market by changing the operating model of asset management itself. The first wave was wrappers. We believe the next wave is funds, cash products, private credit, and real assets that can be issued, distributed, financed, and posted as collateral without losing legal clarity.

-

DISCLAIMER: All views expressed are Hivemind’s own views. The information provided herein has been produced and issued by Hivemind Capital Partners UK LLP and/or Hivemind Capital Partners LLC (“Hivemind”) and is being provided for informational purposes only. This document is not to be distributed or reproduced in any way. This document does not constitute or contain an offer to purchase or sell securities. This document is confidential and intended for the person to whom this was delivered. If you have not received this document from Hivemind you are hereby notified that you have received it from a non-authorized source and you are prohibited from reading, using, retaining, disseminating or copying this material without the prior express written consent of Hivemind. Neither Hivemind nor any of its affiliates or representatives makes any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein or any other written or oral communication transmitted or made to the recipient. The information contained in this document is current as of the date indicated, and Hivemind undertakes no obligation to update, modify or amend this document or to otherwise notify a reader in the event that any matter stated herein changes or subsequently becomes inaccurate.

This document has not been compiled, reviewed, or audited by an independent accountant. Past performance should not be construed as an indicator of future results, and there can be no assurance that historical trends will continue. This document does not include information regarding each investment or investment strategy pursued by the Funds. References to investments included herein should not be construed as a recommendation of any particular investment.

Certain information contained herein may constitute “forward-looking statements,” which can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “project,” “estimate,” “intend,” “continue,” or “believe,” or the negatives thereof, other variations thereon or comparable terminology. All such forward-looking statements are solely statements of opinion, and there is no assurance that they will be predictive of actual events.

More Posts

View All

Articles

Africa’s Leapfrog into Stablecoins & Borderless Banking

Jun 2026

Africa’s Leapfrog into Stablecoins & Borderless Banking

Articles

The CLARITY Act as an Evolution of The Howey Test

Jun 2026

The CLARITY Act as an Evolution of The Howey Test